Find a Lawyer
Latest DRI Blog Post
The Court Reporter
 

DRI Featured Articles

View More Articles
The Role of Medical Examiners and Forensic Pathologists in the Defense of Wrongful Death Cases

In catastrophic injury cases, defense counsel are most familiar with the first responder investigations conducted by local and state police and fire departments.  In death cases, however, there is a third public responder, the local Medical Examiner’s Office. 

 view more
A Fresh Challenge to Standing Under Consumer Protection Laws

The United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia recently dismissed West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act (WVCCPA) consumer protection claims because the plaintiffs lacked standing as a result of their bankruptcy discharge. Fabian, et al. v. Home Loan Center, Inc., et al., No. 5:14-CV-42, 2014 WL 1648289 (N.D. W. Va. Apr. 24, 2014). Claims under the WVCCPA are available to a “consumer,” defined as “any natural personobligated or allegedly obligated to pay any debt.” W. Va. Code § 46A-2-122(a) (emphasis added). The court reasoned that because the plaintiffs were relieved of personal liability for the debt by virtue of the discharge that they received in bankruptcy, they were no longer obligated to pay the debt and therefore could not meet the definition of a consumer. In reaching its decision, the court cited an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which applied the same argument to claims brought under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. Arruda v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 310 F.3d 13, 23 (1st Cir. 2002).

 view more
Holding a Plaintiff to His or Her Burden: <i>Guidance from a recent Fourth Circuit opinion for challenging a whistleblower’s prima facie case.</i>

From a case involving allegations of criminal export violations, falsified board meeting minutes, and insider trading, defense attorneys can find renewed hope for defeating whistleblower claims. In Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corporation, __ F.3d __, 2014 WL 1876546 (4th Cir. 2014), a unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court’s entry of summary judgment for the defendants on claims brought under the anti-retaliation provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), 18 U.S.C. § 1514A. After analyzing the evidence, the court of appeals determined that the plaintiff had failed to establish that any protected activity was a contributing factor in his termination and that he had therefore failed to establish a prima facie case of retaliation. The result is a well-reasoned opinion demonstrating how a whistleblower’s burden is not met absent sufficient evidence.

 view more
View More Articles

 

DRI Defense Docket

Display Articles By Topic
Obamacare Subsidy Loss May Boost Premiums, Chase Insurers  - Bloomberg 7/23/2014
Apple’s California Workers Can Sue as Group Over Breaks  - Bloomberg 7/23/2014
Legal, liability issues arise with Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 crash  - Inside Counsel 7/23/2014
Chrysler recalling up to 792,000 SUVs over switches  - USA Today 7/23/2014
Split Obamacare Court Rulings Revive Health-Care Debate  - Bloomberg 7/23/2014
icix making strides in risk management of global supply chains  - Inside Counsel 7/23/2014
Sterling Says NBA Tricked Him  - Courthouse News Service 7/23/2014
Toshiba May Increase Damages Sought in SK Hynix Lawsuit  - Bloomberg 7/23/2014
Pro-whistleblower organizations ask SEC to clarify protections for employees  - Inside Counsel 7/23/2014
EU May Need Extra Concessions From Google Antitrust Probe  - Bloomberg 7/23/2014
Latest Obamacare legal knot won't be easy to untangle  - Reuters 7/23/2014
Whirlpool threatens withdraw from Energy Star program if class action lawsuits are not halted  - Inside Counsel 7/23/2014
Obama Administration Said to Plan Oil-by-Rail Rules  - Bloomberg 7/23/2014
Law school applications down 37 percent since 2010; first-year class could be smallest in 40 years  - ABA Journal 7/23/2014
Ohio State files trademark infringement suit over O-H-I-O T-shirt image  - Inside Counsel 7/23/2014
 

DRI Neutrals Database 

USLAW NETWORK’s Corporate Counsel Corner



DRI Resources